Logitech’s $30 F710 Controller Sparks Controversy in Massive $50M Lawsuit Following Titan Sub Tragedy!

N-Ninja
2 Min Read
OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush ‍demonstrating the game controller piloting the Titan sub during a CBS Sunday Morning feature⁤ in November 2022.

Enlarge / OceanGate’s‌ Stockton Rush⁢ demonstrates the 2010-era game controller utilized for navigating the Titan sub during a segment on CBS Sunday Morning aired in November 2022. (credit: CBS⁣ Sunday Morning)

During a ‌segment featured on CBS Sunday Morning in ​2022, Stockton Rush, the CEO of OceanGate, delighted journalist David Pogue by revealing an unexpected detail about their deep-sea ⁣vessel operations. “We handle everything with this game controller,” he stated while showcasing ⁢a‌ Logitech F710 controller​ equipped with custom thumbstick extensions made via 3D printing. This wireless device served as the main control mechanism for their submersible, intended for an expedition to explore the wreck of the infamous Titanic. Pogue reacted with disbelief and ⁤humor as he covered his‌ eyes.

This revelation ⁢sparked considerable interest among journalists,‍ drawing attention to how economical options like the⁢ F710 could be integrated into serious technologies, especially given that similar video game controllers have recently found roles in military and aerospace fields. The rationale here becomes particularly compelling when considering that many engineers‍ and pilots are already adept at manipulating these devices from childhood‍ experiences playing games ⁢such as Halo.

The application of a gaming console did not seem unreasonable at first glance; ​however, following a tragic incident where the Titan submersible imploded⁤ during its June 2023 journey near Titanic’s remains, leading to fatalities among all‌ five individuals aboard including‌ Rush himself, perceptions shifted‌ considerably. What was once perceived ⁢as an innovative approach suddenly raised concerns regarding safety protocols associated with‍ using an inexpensive $30 control interface—transforming its former image from being “impressive” to “potentially hazardous.” Legal discussions about liability‍ began looming over companies involved in such design ⁣choices.

Read more paragraphs | Comments

Source

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *