24 State Attorneys General Rally Behind Arizona’s Law Demanding Proof of Citizenship to Vote in Urgent Supreme Court Stay!

N-Ninja
3 Min Read

### Support for Arizona’s Voting Legislation

A significant coalition of U.S. ​attorneys general, nearly⁢ half of the total in the country, have submitted amicus briefs to the Supreme⁢ Court advocating for an immediate stay that would empower Arizona‍ to mandate proof of​ U.S. citizenship⁤ as a ⁤prerequisite for voting ⁢in federal elections.

On Thursday, the Republican Party of Arizona announced its ​submission of‌ an emergency application ⁣related to an ongoing ⁢appeal from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. This action supports House Bill 2492—a ‌law that necessitates ‍citizens provide ⁢proof of their citizenship when voting in presidential elections.

The legislation stipulates that voters must⁢ show evidence of citizenship even when submitting ballots via mail, reinforcing ‍state efforts‍ to ‌ensure election integrity.

“The Constitution empowers states to determine‌ voter eligibility,⁤ and Arizona is at⁣ the forefront ensuring that only citizens participate in our⁣ electoral processes,” tweeted the Arizona GOP.‌ “This case could definitively eliminate non-citizen voting, which has⁤ always been a necessary standard.”

### Legal Backing from ⁣Various‌ States

Backing ⁢this movement are attorneys general from 24 ⁢additional states—including Texas, Florida, and Georgia—collaborating with Kansas and West Virginia on this brief.

The Dhillon Law Group filed this document asserting that recent district court rulings contradict constitutional⁤ provisions allowing states to ⁣enforce⁤ proof-of-citizenship requirements during elections.

Harmeet Dhillon, lead counsel for this initiative, stated: “The Court must promptly grant a stay on any injunctions by District Courts hindering Arizona’s constitutional rights regarding⁢ how it selects its ⁣presidential electors.”

### Advocacy ‍for Voter Integrity

The non-partisan ‌organization Honest Elections ⁤Project supports these measures by affirming states’ rights to⁣ request proof of citizenship specifically for mail-in ballots.⁢ They assert on⁤ their ‌website: “We urge the Supreme Court to ​permit Arizona’s law implementation so⁣ states can safeguard⁤ their electoral processes.”

Meanwhile, ⁣an emergency application lodged by ⁣the Republican National Committee emphasizes ongoing concerns‍ regarding ⁤voter integrity amid rising populations described as “illegal aliens.”

They noted: “Given evidence suggesting a growth⁢ in non-citizen ⁢populations—with one study estimating over 11 million‌ undocumented immigrants residing‍ in ‌America as recently ‍as⁤ 2019—there exists considerable cause for alarm.”

Each⁢ undocumented individual potentially increases opportunities ⁤for voter fraud—a concern compounded not only by those here illegally but also including ​individuals legally present who may lack voting rights or have overstayed their visas.

By illuminating these ​perspectives surrounding election security laws like those proposed in Arizona and supported widely among several states’​ leaders and ​organizations advocating transparency at polls — national discussions around qualifying voters have certainly intensified.

Source

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *