Marc Piasecki/Getty Images
- A judge expressed skepticism about restoring Elon Musk’s substantial pay package from Tesla.
- Tesla’s attorneys contended that a favorable shareholder vote should justify the reimplementation of his compensation.
- The judge, who previously annulled the pay agreement, indicated that this matter is not resolved yet.
In Delaware, doubts were cast by a judge regarding whether Elon Musk’s $55 billion remuneration from Tesla can be reinstated, even with shareholders’ recent endorsement. This uncertainty comes despite arguments presented by Tesla’s legal counsel, who maintained that a June shareholder vote confirming the pay package ought to facilitate its return.
On Friday, lawyers representing Tesla contended in court that following this shareholder decision would reflect effective corporate governance principles. “Recognizing this shareholders’ decision validates our democratic approach,” noted David Ross, an attorney for Musk and reported by The Associated Press.
However, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick remained unconvinced during proceedings. She remarked that she would reflect further on their claims and emphasized that this situation “is not concluded now,” as cited by The Wall Street Journal.
McCormick highlighted a critical point: there exists no established legal framework allowing for such post-trial votes to overturn decisions about fiduciary breaches committed by corporate executives. “This has no precedent,” she stated according to AP’s coverage.
This ongoing discourse traces back to Judge McCormick’s earlier ruling in January when she labeled Musk’s original approval process as “seriously flawed.” She pointed out his significant connections to individuals negotiating on behalf of Tesla which led her to nullify his compensation arrangement initially designed for him.
The contentious backdrop derives from ongoing litigation tied to a 2018 lawsuit initiated by Richard Tornetta, a concerned Tesla investor. Tornetta argued then that both Musk and the company neglected their fiduciary responsibilities when they devised an excessively generous pay scheme viewed as straying well beyond what could be reasonably justified.
Musk has kept most details about these legal proceedings under wraps but alluded humorously in January via social platform X: “Avoid incorporating your business in Delaware.” As part of moving forward amid uncertainties surrounding corporate governance there, he initiated steps earlier this year aimed at relocating both Tesla and SpaceX operations from Delaware to Texas legally.
No immediate responses have been received from either lawyers representing Musk or representatives managing affairs at Tesla concerning inquiries made by Business Insider about these developments.
